Home » AVO » Do the Police Need Evidence to Charge You in Australia?

Do the Police Need Evidence to Charge You in Australia?

do the police need evidence to charge you | Justice Family Lawyers

For the police to charge you with a crime in Australia, they must generally have reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has been committed and that you are the perpetrator.

Typically, this requires some level of evidence. Physical evidence, witness statements, and circumstantial evidence are only a few examples of the various types of evidence that can be presented in court.

However, being charged does not necessarily mean that you will be convicted. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution must typically prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime.

The threshold for filing charges is lower than that for achieving a conviction.

Can the Police Charge You Without Hard Evidence? 

To charge you with a crime, the police do not necessarily need “hard evidence.” What is required are “reasonable grounds” to suspect an offence has been committed.

There may be multiple types of evidence involved, not all of which are physical or “hard” evidence.

“Hard evidence” refers to physical, tangible objects or clear, conclusive evidence.

This may consist of DNA, fingerprints, and surveillance footage. Even though this type of evidence can be persuasive, it is only sometimes necessary for police to file charges.

The police may also rely on “soft evidence” such as witness statements, circumstantial evidence, and observable behaviour patterns.

For instance, if multiple credible witnesses independently state that they saw you commit a crime, the police may charge you based on these statements, even without physical evidence.

Also read: AVO Compliance Check by Police: Process and Purpose

Do the Police Need Evidence to Charge You, and What Types of Physical Evidence Can Be Used Against You?

In Australia, types of hard evidence that may be used against you include:

  1. Physical Objects: These could be weapons, stolen goods, items left at a crime scene, drug paraphernalia, or any physical item connected to the alleged crime.
  2. DNA Evidence: Biological samples such as blood, hair, skin cells, or other bodily fluids can be analysed for DNA connecting an individual to a crime scene or victim.
  3. Fingerprints: These can be lifted from a crime scene and matched to a suspect.
  4. Photographs and Video Recordings: These include surveillance footage, photos from a crime scene, or any visual evidence that links a person to a crime.
  5. Audio Recordings: These could be wiretaps, voicemails, or other recorded audio that may provide incriminating evidence.
  6. Digital Evidence: This can include computer files, emails, text messages, browser histories, or data from GPS devices, among others. While digital evidence might not be “hard” physically, it can provide irrefutable proof of specific actions or communications.
  7. Forensic Evidence: This can include ballistics reports, autopsy results, toxicology reports, or any other evidence derived from scientific analysis of physical materials.
  8. Documents: Written documents, such as letters, contracts, or fraudulent forms, can be hard evidence if they are related to the crime.

How Much Evidence is Needed to Charge Someone in Australia?

The police need to have “reasonable grounds” to believe that a crime has been committed and that the person being charged is the one who committed it. This doesn’t necessarily mean they need irrefutable proof or “hard evidence” like DNA or a confession at the time of charging.

What constitutes “reasonable grounds” can vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case. However, it generally means that the police have enough evidence to create a reasonable suspicion that the person is guilty. This could include:

  • Witness statements
  • Physical evidence found at the scene
  • Surveillance footage
  • A suspect’s behavior or statements

It’s crucial to remember that the standard of proof for charging someone is lower than the standard needed to convict them in court. To secure a conviction, the prosecution must prove the accused’s guilt “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

While the police do need some level of evidence to charge someone in Australia, it doesn’t have to be conclusive evidence at that initial stage. The focus is on having reasonable grounds for suspicion.

Need a Lawyer?

Do the Police Need Evidence to Charge You, and What Are The Sample Of Soft Evidence? 

“Soft evidence” typically refers to forms of proof that are less tangible or more subjective than “hard evidence.” Here are some examples of soft evidence:

  1. Witness Testimony: An individual’s account of what they saw, heard, or experienced related to an alleged crime. Their memory or perspective might be subject to errors or bias.
  2. Character Evidence: Information about a person’s past behaviour, reputation, or personality traits that may indicate their likelihood to commit a specific act. This is only admissible under certain conditions.
  3. Circumstantial Evidence: Evidence that requires an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—like a fingerprint at the crime scene, which doesn’t directly prove who committed the crime but establishes that a specific person was present.
  4. Expert Opinion: An expert in a particular field—like a forensic analyst, psychiatrist, or handwriting expert—might provide an interpretation of evidence or an opinion on a specific matter. This relies on the expert’s credibility and the strength of their analysis.
  5. Hearsay Evidence: An out-of-court statement presented for the truth of the matter it asserts. While hearsay evidence is often inadmissible due to its unreliability, exceptions exist.
  6. Pattern Evidence: If a person has engaged in a consistent pattern of behaviour, it might be used to suggest they acted in the same way on the occasion in question. This can include patterns of criminal activity or conduct that indicate a motive.
  7. Confessions: Verbal or written statements in which a person admits to committing a crime. The reliability of confessions can sometimes be questioned, especially if there’s a possibility they were coerced.

How Long Can Police Hold Evidence Without Charges in Australia

In Australia, the police can hold evidence for varying lengths of time, depending on the case’s specifics and the type of evidence.

Generally, there is no fixed period, but the police are expected to act within a reasonable time frame to either lay charges or return the evidence.

If charges are not laid, individuals can apply to have their property returned, but this process can be complex and is subject to the discretion of the police and the courts.

The retention of evidence without charges often hinges on ongoing investigations and the potential for future prosecution. If new evidence or information arises, the police may retain evidence longer to support their case.

However, it’s important to remember that individuals have the right to challenge the prolonged holding of their property through legal avenues, empowering them to take action if they feel their rights are being infringed.

How To Know If You’ve Been Charged With An Offence in Australia?

If you’ve been charged with an offence in Australia, there are several ways you may find out:

Arrest: In many cases, if you’re being charged with a criminal offence, you’ll be arrested by police. During the arrest, the police must inform you of the reason for your arrest.

Court Attendance Notice (CAN): You might receive a Court Attendance Notice, a document that states the specific charges against you and includes the date and place you’re required to attend court. It may be handed to you in person, mailed to you, or served in another legally acceptable manner.

Summons: In some cases, particularly with less serious offences, you might receive a summons. A summons is a written order from a court that commands the person named to appear before it at a specific time to answer the charge detailed in it.

Police Charge or Citation: In some instances, such as for traffic violations or minor offences, you may be issued a citation or an infringement notice containing the crime’s details and a fine.

What Happens After You’ve Been Charged?

Once formally charged with a crime, you will receive a charge sheet recorded at the police station to be presented in court. You will also have access to the police prosecution file, where the officer will document communication methods, dates, times, and information provided. You will also have the option of contacting a legal representative and pleading guilty or not guilty.

Do The Police Need Evidence To Charge You?

It’s essential to be informed about your rights. Our experienced AVO legal team at Justice Family Lawyers can provide you with advice and guidance. 

Don’t hesitate to contact us if you’re facing charges or simply need to understand the law better.

Get the facts, know your rights, and find out what truly matters when it comes to the question: Do the police need evidence to charge you?

21 thoughts on “Do the Police Need Evidence to Charge You in Australia?”

      1. There were allegations made by complainants who trespassed onto private property. The charge was a very serious indictable offence Crimes Act 1958 section 23 Penalty level 6 600 pu 5 years maximum prison term or both. The “standard of evidence required” to meet “balance of probabilities”will increase in accordance with the “seriousness and consequences” of the allegations. Will “allegations” given by the complainant give police “probable cause ” to make an arrest?

        1. Hi, unsubstantiated allegations alone may not be sufficient for police to make an arrest for a serious indictable offence, however this can depend on the nature of the case and surrounding circumstances. It is advisable to consult with a criminal lawyer to understand your rights and the specifics of your situation.

  1. If someone was to make a police complaint about me that happened in my own home with no witnesses, no video footage and no physical evidence do they have enough evidence to charge me?

  2. Hi if someone was attacked in my home and they had put a statement against me but later retracted the statement and said they have no memory of what actually happened and there are no further witnesses would this then be dropped as the sole witness has retracted there statement how could the police alledge what has occurred if the victim says they are now not sure how it happened and how they were injured
    ?

  3. If there’s a family violence and the injury to victim but no evidence (No Video, No Witness) and the accused is denying family violence. What could be the potential outcome in court?

    1. In criminal proceedings, the prosecution generally has the burden to prove the accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If there’s limited evidence, this might make it more challenging to meet that standard.

      However, even without video or eyewitness evidence, there may be other forms of physical evidence, such as the nature of the injuries, medical records, damaged property, or forensic evidence that can support the victim’s claim. The credibility, history of offences, and consistency in the testimony of the victim and the accused are also crucial in aiding the court’s decision.

      In some cases, expert witnesses, like psychologists or medical professionals, may also be called to provide expert testimony about the injuries or the patterns of abuse in domestic violence situations.

      Possible outcomes of the court proceedings will vary depending on the specific facts of the case. If the court is convinced of the accused’s guilt based on the presented evidence, they may choose to implement fines, domestic violence orders or terms of imprisonment, depending on the nature and severity of the offence.

      It is important to note that even if no criminal conviction is given, allegations of family violence can impact related family law matters, such as custody disputes or the issuance of protective orders.

    2. If a person wilfully causes property damage and actually admits to doing it verbally ,when questioned by police and is recorded on police officers body cam. Can they be charged by police?
      In this case the perpetrator was not charged , which has left the victim wondering if there is any justice at all.
      Would appreciate your comments.

      1. Yes, if someone admits to causing property damage and it’s captured on police body cam footage, the police can charge them based on that evidence. If no charges were filed, the victim can request a case review by contacting the police department involved or consult a lawyer to discuss the best steps forward.

  4. So if a group of people got together and said you had done something when you hadnt they can frame you and police will believe the group of people as they got there stories straight and a innocent person goes to jail

  5. A bike rider made a statement to police alleging that i tried to run him off the road. i heard from the police what his allegations are, and to my knowledge, are false. There is no evidence, and no witnesses. However, the police have said I will be issued with a fine simply on his statement, do i have to accept this? Is it possible to recieve a fine just from this persons say so?

    1. Hi Justin, it is advisable to carefully read through the fine you receive. It should include information on why the fine was issued and how you can contest it. It may be beneficial to consult with a lawyer who specialises in traffic law to help you understand your options and the best course of action.

  6. E-bike Stolen ($5,5k)

    Chain smashed with hammer

    Eye witness identified 100% the person of interest & puts thief at the Scene

    Video footage from shopping Center Security shows 2-3 teens next to bike attempting to remove lock.

    Bike locked smashed video shows teens leaving with e-Bike.

    Stolen Bike information posted on socials / reported to Police.

    Through investigation process
    the Thief is now 100% identified and after getting hold of & having a conversation with his Mum, this resulted in a 100% confession / statement that it was her Son.

    2nd statement from Older Brother who informed us his younger Brother was the thief and stated particulars about the events.

    Can we proceed with prosecution?

    Best option for conviction of repeat offenders?

    Or best options ?

    1. You appear to have strong evidence against the identified perpetrator, including eyewitness accounts, video footage, and confessions from the suspect’s mother and brother, which would support pursuing charges through the criminal justice system. It is advisable to consult with a solicitor experienced in criminal law to better understand the process and likely outcomes.

  7. I have been the victim of psychological abuse for years and only recently discovered what was being done to me.
    I have letters, video footage, msgs, emails and witnesses.
    Can I have this person charged?

    1. Yes, you can report the psychological abuse to the police and provide them with your evidence to support your claims. The police will investigate and determine if there is sufficient evidence to lay charges against the abuser.

  8. Is an affadit, police reports, kids statements, video and voice recordings, text messages enough evidence for some form of punishment for the abuser of family domestic violence including physical abuse, mental, emotional and financial abuse? An interim intervention order is active for mother and all children now for over 2 years and abuser has high paying good lawyer who has dragged on any criminal proceedings and only wants his client to do an abuse program and avoid any charges or criminal records. Prosecution saying they don’t want to go to trial as it will be traumatic for kids so is happy to just let him get away with all the abuse the family has endured and suffered over 13 years?

    1. Yes, affidavits, police reports, children’s statements, videos, voice recordings, and text messages can provide strong evidence in a domestic violence case. It’s advisable to consult a family lawyer who specialises in domestic violence matters to ensure the evidence is clearly presented to the court and the abuser is held accountable.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *