What is equal shared parental responsibility in Australia?
What is Equal Shared Parental Responsibility
Equal shared parental responsibility refers to the concept that both parents, even after separation or divorce, have an equal role in making major long-term decisions for their child. These decisions can include choices about education, medical treatment, and religious or cultural upbringing.
It is important to understand that equal shared parental responsibility does not mean that a child will spend the same amount of time with each parent. Instead, it is about decision-making rights and responsibilities.
Under the Family Law Act, this principle historically reflected the idea that children benefit from the involvement of both parents in important aspects of their lives, provided it is safe and appropriate.
Key Principles
- Best Interests of the Child: The court considers the child’s best interests first when deciding on equal shared parental responsibility.
- Genuine Consultation: Parents are expected to communicate and try to reach agreement before making significant decisions.
- Not Absolute: The principle does not apply in all situations, particularly where safety or practical concerns exist.
When the Presumption Does NOT Apply
The court would not apply the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility if there were reasonable grounds to believe any of the following:
- Family Violence or Abuse: If one parent, or someone in their household, had been abusive towards the child or the other parent.
- Child Protection Concerns: Where there were concerns about a parent’s ability to meet the child’s needs safely.
- Impracticality: Where parents lived far apart or could not communicate effectively enough to make joint decisions.
- The Family Law Act recognised that shared decision-making could only work where it was safe and practical for all involved.
What Does Presumption of Equal Shared Parental Responsibility Mean
The presumption of equal shared parental responsibility in the Family Law Act meant that unless there was evidence suggesting otherwise, the court started with the view that it was in the child’s best interests for both parents to share decision-making powers.
This reflected the value placed on children having meaningful relationships with both parents after separation. It was a starting point, not a guarantee, and could be set aside if circumstances made it unsuitable.
Reviews
Equal Shared Parental Responsibility Before 2024
Before May 2024, the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility had a significant influence in Australian family law.
- Key Features
- Presumption, Not Mandate: The Family Law Act established the presumption as a starting point for decision-making, but it did not mean equal time.
- Evidence to the Contrary: The presumption could be rebutted if there was evidence that it was not suitable.
- Encouraging Cooperation: Even when the presumption was overturned, courts encouraged communication where it was in the child’s best interests.
- Practical Implications
- Negotiations: Parenting plans often began with an assumption of joint decision-making on major issues.
- Reduced Court Intervention: Some parents were able to settle arrangements without a lengthy court process.
- Potential Challenges: Disagreements could still arise, particularly when communication was strained.
Equal Shared Parental Responsibility After 2024
After May 2024, there is no longer a presumption of equal shared parental responsibility in the Family Law Act.
Changes to the Law
- Repeal of the Presumption: Courts now assess each case individually without starting from the assumption of shared decision-making.
- Best Interests Focus: The child’s best interests are considered on a case-by-case basis.
What This Means in Practice
- No Automatic ESPR: Parents are not automatically given equal shared parental responsibility.
- Individualised Assessment: Arrangements may still involve shared responsibility if it suits the child’s needs.
- Safety First: Courts can focus more on safety and wellbeing without being bound by a presumption.
Possible Outcomes After 2024
- Continued Shared Responsibility: Where appropriate, parents may still agree on joint decision-making.
- Sole Responsibility: In some cases, one parent may be given sole responsibility for certain or all decisions.
- Specific Orders: Courts can allocate responsibility for specific areas such as health or education.
Why the Change Occurred
- Addressing Misunderstandings: Many believed equal shared parental responsibility meant equal time, which was not the case.
- Emphasis on Best Interests: The reform reinforces that every case is unique.
Frequently Asked Questions
No, it refers to shared decision-making about major long-term matters, not time spent with each parent.
Yes, but it will depend on the specific circumstances and whether it aligns with the child’s best interests.
The court will consider evidence of any risk to the child’s wellbeing before deciding on parental responsibility.
Yes, the Family Law Act remains the primary legislation for determining parental responsibility and parenting arrangements.
This will depend on the level of communication, safety, and the child’s needs.
Learn what steps you can take next.
If you are dealing with parenting arrangements and want to better understand how equal shared parental responsibility works under the Family Law Act, it may help to speak with a child custody lawyer who can explain your options in plain language. The right information can help you make decisions that support your child’s wellbeing.
Let us Help You
Reach out for an exploratory conversation.
